Clash of visions: Harris vs. Trump on America’s future
The debate between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump highlighted deep ideological divisions. Trump criticised Harris’s economic plans and defended his role in overturning Roe v. Wade, while Harris condemned Trump’s policies, particularly on abortion, immigration, and national security.
T he debate between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump on Tuesday evening was characterised by a series of sharply worded statements, highlighting the deep ideological divisions between the two candidates. Their exchanges underscored the contrasting policies and personal attacks that have defined the 2024 election campaign.
Trump on the Economy
Donald Trump repeatedly attacked Kamala Harris’s economic proposals, specifically her plan for an “opportunity economy,” which focuses on creating equal opportunities for all Americans to succeed. He accused Harris of offering platitudes without substance, saying, “She doesn’t have a plan. She copied Biden’s plan. And it’s like four sentences, like ‘run-Spot-run.’ Four sentences that are just, oh, we’ll try and lower taxes. She doesn’t have a plan. Take a look at her plan. She doesn’t have a plan.”
Trump also claimed his economic track record was far superior, pointing to the strength of the pre-pandemic economy during his presidency. “I created one of the greatest economies in the history of our country. I’ll do it again and even better.” He argued that inflation, under the Biden-Harris administration, had “destroyed the middle class,” saying, “We’ve had a terrible economy because inflation… breaks up countries. We have inflation like very few people have ever seen before. Probably the worst in our nation’s history.”
CONTINUE READING...
Enjoy unlimited access now.
To get full access to this article,
simply become a member of PUBLIC SQUARE now.
By doing so, you will be supporting
our independent journalism.
MEMBERSHIP OPTIONS:
£3/month ∙ £5/month ∙ £7/month
You can cancel anytime.
BECOME A MEMBER
Already a member? Sign in here!
BENEFITS OF MEMBERSHIP:
✅ Read exclusive member-only articles
✅ Read our daily review of the UK front pages
✅ Receive every new article by email
✅ Access all our articles
✅ Get Special Discounts with our partners
✅ Join the conversation: Comment our articles
✅ Access our archives
✅ More importantly: Support independent journalism and keep the magazine going
Read more
— A global report reveals rising repression and criminalisation of climate and environmental protests, with state and corporate actors employing anti-protest laws, harsher policing, and violence to stifle activism worldwide.
— Polling accuracy in the U.S. presidential election faced criticism, despite improved performance over 2020. Small errors in a tight race amplified perceived inaccuracies, but swing state polls generally proved reliable, reflecting a close contest, Professor John Curtice explains.
— National populism, fuelled by media-backed disinformation, anti-immigrant rhetoric, and libertarian ideologies, threatens democracies globally by eroding institutions, fostering fear, and exploiting divisions.
— A UK tribunal upheld the ban on a Chinese businessman, citing national security risks. His links to Prince Andrew underscore concerns about foreign influence and lapses in public scrutiny.
|