High-flying politics: Sunak under fire for VIP helicopter contract
The recent revelation that Rishi Sunak personally intervened to save a £40 million helicopter contract for VIP transport has sparked public debate about the use of public funds and the prime minister’s own travel habits.
The recent revelation that Rishi Sunak personally intervened to save a £40 million helicopter contract for VIP transport has sparked public debate about the use of public funds and the prime minister’s own travel habits.
L ast August, Ben Wallace, the former Defence Secretary, decided to terminate the £40 million contract for the two VIP helicopters used by the prime minister. A decision based on the grounds of cost-effectiveness and the availability of alternative transportation options, particularly public transport.
Rishi Sunak then personally intervened to prevent the cancellation of the contract with Sloane Helicopters, a Northamptonshire-based company. The PM’s decision has drawn criticism from various quarters, with opponents questioning the cost-effectiveness and environmental impact of such lavish transportation arrangements.
The controversy surrounding the helicopter contract stems from Sunak’s frequent use of helicopters, particularly for relatively short domestic journeys. In May 2023, he took an expensive helicopter flight from London to Southampton for a trip that could have been easily covered by public transport. Similarly, in June, he opted for an RAF helicopter to travel from London to Dover for a speech, a journey that could have been accomplished by high-speed rail.
CONTINUE READING...
Enjoy unlimited access now.
To get full access to this article,
simply become a member of PUBLIC SQUARE now.
By doing so, you will be supporting
our independent journalism.
MEMBERSHIP OPTIONS:
£3/month ∙ £5/month ∙ £7/month
You can cancel anytime.
BECOME A MEMBER
Already a member? Sign in here!
BENEFITS OF MEMBERSHIP:
✅ Read exclusive member-only articles
✅ Read our daily review of the UK front pages
✅ Receive every new article by email
✅ Access all our articles
✅ Get Special Discounts with our partners
✅ Join the conversation: Comment our articles
✅ Access our archives
✅ More importantly: Support independent journalism and keep the magazine going
Read more
— A UK tribunal upheld the ban on a Chinese businessman, citing national security risks. His links to Prince Andrew underscore concerns about foreign influence and lapses in public scrutiny.
— Your daily roundup of the front pages of the main newspapers and magazines today in the UK... and beyond.
— Polling accuracy in the U.S. presidential election faced criticism, despite improved performance over 2020. Small errors in a tight race amplified perceived inaccuracies, but swing state polls generally proved reliable, reflecting a close contest, Professor John Curtice explains.
— In an unusual tribute to U.S. Confederate exiles and their pro-slavery legacy, a small Brazilian town had hosted a ‘Confederate Festival’ for decades, blending Southern traditions with Confederate symbols and local culture — until backlash spurred its rebranding for 2025.
|
|
