From I’m a Celeb to Strictly: Public verdict on politicians in Reality TV
The return of the debate on politicians in reality TV is highlighted by Nigel Farage’s participation in I’m a Celeb. A recent YouGov survey reflects mixed public opinions on the suitability of politicians in reality TV.
![From I’m a Celeb to Strictly: Public verdict on politicians in Reality TV](/content/images/size/w1200/2023/12/www-0937.jpg)
The return of the debate on politicians in reality TV is highlighted by Nigel Farage’s participation in I’m a Celeb. Previous political figures, including Nadine Dorries and Matt Hancock, have stirred controversy. A recent YouGov survey reflects mixed public opinions on the suitability of politicians in reality TV.
T he debate surrounding the suitability of politicians appearing on television has resurfaced with Nigel Farage currently in Australia for I’m a Celeb. Prior to him, other politicians ventured into the Australian-based program presented by Ant and Dec, including Lembit Opik (2010), Nadine Dorries (2012), and Matt Hancock (2022).
But this discussion is not new, as other politicians have previously participated in reality TV shows. For example, George Galloway took part in Big Brother (2006), Penny Mordaunt appeared in Splash (2014), and Ann Widdecombe (2010) and Ed Balls (2015) joined Strictly.
To assess public opinion on this matter, YouGov conducted a survey, asking the British public whether they believe politicians or ex-politicians are suited for television when participating in reality TV shows.
Ant and Dec appeared to make it clear this weekend that they want ITV to take a break from recruiting politicians to enter #ImACeleb
— Metro (@MetroUK) December 3, 2023
‘I’m a Celeb has just fully ruined all of its credibility. First Matt Hancock. Now Nigel Farage?’ raged one viewerhttps://t.co/F8WGu6J4iS
CONTINUE READING...
Enjoy unlimited access now.
To get full access to this article,
simply become a member of PUBLIC SQUARE now.
By doing so, you will be supporting
our independent journalism.
MEMBERSHIP OPTIONS:
£3/month ∙ £5/month ∙ £7/month
You can cancel anytime.
BECOME A MEMBER
Already a member? Sign in here!
BENEFITS OF MEMBERSHIP:
✅ Read exclusive member-only articles
✅ Read our daily review of the UK front pages
✅ Receive every new article by email
✅ Access all our articles
✅ Get Special Discounts with our partners
✅ Join the conversation: Comment our articles
✅ Access our archives
✅ More importantly: Support independent journalism and keep the magazine going
Read more
![Why Labour should worry this election will be more like 2001 than 1997](/content/images/size/w600/2024/07/000105-min.png)
— Labour fears a low voter turnout may jeopardise their anticipated landslide victory. Historical data, particularly from 2001, shows turnout significantly impacts election outcomes. Many voters are undecided or complacent, threatening Labour’s confidence.
![UK General Election Voting Intention](/content/images/size/w600/2024/02/www-1041.jpg)
— The state of voting intentions in the General Election. Labour’s vote intention remains significantly high a couple of days before the general election.
![Front pages 📰 3 July 2024](/content/images/size/w600/2023/05/0---cover-press-review-min-13.jpg)
— Your daily roundup of the front pages of the main newspapers and magazines today in the UK.
![Tories lacking transparency: 14 years of undermining Freedom of Information](/content/images/size/w600/2024/07/000099-min.png)
— Freedom of Information in the UK is declining, with full request approvals dropping from 55% in 2013 to 34% recently. Successive Conservative governments have increasingly restricted it, undermining transparency and accountability.
|