A monumental victory empowering women in Britain
In a significant legal shift, Nina Cresswell emerges victorious after naming her attacker online. Her landmark case highlights the importance of women’s voices in the public domain, ensuring their perpetrators do not silence them.
In a significant legal shift, Nina Cresswell emerges victorious after naming her attacker online. Her landmark case highlights the importance of women’s voices in the public domain, ensuring their perpetrators do not silence them.
I n a world where every voice is critical, it is vital that those who have been wronged can speak their truth. Nina Cresswell’s tale exemplifies this, revealing a woman’s courage to stand tall against intimidation and the power of unity in the face of adversity.
A fateful night in 2010
One evening in 2010, as she was returning home, Nina Cresswell endured an unspeakable trauma at the hands of a man. A sexual assault. Like any right-minded individual, she approached the authorities, hoping for justice. The police interviewed her at home. Unfortunately, it did not culminate in the justice she hoped for.
Despite her immediate action, the case didn’t move forward. The police dropped the case. They recorded that no crime had been committed. The despair one might feel, after seeking protection from the authorities only to be left unheard, is immeasurable. But for Nina, giving up wasn’t an option.
#MeToo
As avenues for justice seemed to close, the global #MeToo movement, which began as a whisper, soon erupted into a cacophony of voices worldwide. #MeToo offered survivors like Nina an opportunity to share their stories. Nina took the bold step of naming her assailant online, hoping to shield other women from a similar fate.
She bravely shared her story of sexual assault on Telegra.ph, an anonymous blogging site. Feeling a sense of responsibility, she privately sent her account to a few friends, wanting to warn other women about the perpetrator.
CONTINUE READING...
Enjoy unlimited access now.
To get full access to this article,
simply become a member of PUBLIC SQUARE now.
By doing so, you will be supporting
our independent journalism.
MEMBERSHIP OPTIONS:
£3/month ∙ £5/month ∙ £7/month
You can cancel anytime.
BECOME A MEMBER
Already a member? Sign in here!
BENEFITS OF MEMBERSHIP:
✅ Read exclusive member-only articles
✅ Read our daily review of the UK front pages
✅ Receive every new article by email
✅ Access all our articles
✅ Get Special Discounts with our partners
✅ Join the conversation: Comment our articles
✅ Access our archives
✅ More importantly: Support independent journalism and keep the magazine going
Read more
— A UK tribunal upheld the ban on a Chinese businessman, citing national security risks. His links to Prince Andrew underscore concerns about foreign influence and lapses in public scrutiny.
— Your daily roundup of the front pages of the main newspapers and magazines today in the UK... and beyond.
— Polling accuracy in the U.S. presidential election faced criticism, despite improved performance over 2020. Small errors in a tight race amplified perceived inaccuracies, but swing state polls generally proved reliable, reflecting a close contest, Professor John Curtice explains.
— In an unusual tribute to U.S. Confederate exiles and their pro-slavery legacy, a small Brazilian town had hosted a ‘Confederate Festival’ for decades, blending Southern traditions with Confederate symbols and local culture — until backlash spurred its rebranding for 2025.
|