OPINION

Putin’s retaliatory list is a badge of honour.

Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon has been included on a list of politicians from the UK who have been sanctioned by Vladimir Putin’s regime and banned from ever visiting Russia again. Wee Ginger Dug explains what it means for Scotland.



Putin’s retaliatory list is a badge of honour.

Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon has been included on a list of politicians from the UK who have been sanctioned by Vladimir Putin’s regime and banned from ever visiting Russia again. Wee Ginger Dug explains what it means for Scotland.


First published: April 2022.


We can be sure she’s about as gutted by this development as you would be if you had just been informed that you are no longer welcome at the AGM of the Nigel Farage fan club. It’s not so much a sanction as it is a badge of pride.

There are far worse things than never being allowed to visit Putin’s Russia, such as being taken there against your will and then not being allowed to leave, after the Russian army has blown up your home and killed your neighbours, a fate which has apparently befallen thousands of Ukrainians from the besieged and destroyed city of Mariupol.

Much to the chagrin of the howling British nationalists who infest the comments section of the Herald newspaper, who used the news as an opportunity to indulge themselves in their frothing hatred, Nicola Sturgeon is the only Scottish politician who has come to the attention of the Putin regime and been subjected to Russian retaliatory measures. Douglas “I’m totally focused on the situation in Ukraine” Ross has been ignored by the Russian regime, which is not entirely surprising seeing as how he is also ignored by his own colleagues in Westminster. The Putin regime obviously shares their opinion that he is a lightweight. You don’t waste time dealing with irrelevancies.

Like what you are reading? Please, support our work today!

Support PMP Magazine

As we all know, international affairs are a matter which is very firmly reserved to Westminster. Under devolution, it is not up to the Scottish Government to decide what sanctions to impose on Putin and his cronies or to make decisions about military or humanitarian aid for the Ukrainians. As we all also know, and Russian intelligence also certainly knows, the Conservatives in Westminster do not consult with or seek input from the Scottish Government even when dealing with issues which have a direct effect on devolved matters or the devolution settlement, so they are certainly not going to seek any input from Holyrood on an international issue which is the sole preserve of Westminster.

The Russian government most assuredly knows that the Scottish Government and Nicola Sturgeon have had very little, if any, input in shaping the British response to Putin’s war in Ukraine. It was notable that the list of people who are to be subject to Russian retaliatory sanctions did not include any of the other leaders of the devolved administrations. Welsh First Minister Mark Drakeford was not amongst those banned from ever setting foot on Russian soil. Apart from the Scottish First Minister, all those on the Russian list are senior figures in the British Government and the Conservative administration in Westminster.



For more stories like this, sign up to our FREE Briefings today.



So it is worth asking why the Putin regime has made such an exception, given that the Russians know that the devolved governments have no influence on the British Government’s response to the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Some of the aforementioned British nationalist howlers have claimed that the inclusion of Nicola Sturgeon on the Russian sanctions list is merely a fiendish attempt by Putin to stir up Scottish nationalism and have managed to contort reality to such an extent that they have convinced themselves that the declaration by the Kremlin that Nicola Sturgeon is persona non-grata is somehow proof that the Scottish independence movement and the SNP are in Putin’s pocket. However, were it purely a matter of this being a Russian attempt to foment divisions within the British state they would certainly have included the Welsh First Minister on their list too, and also quite possibly leading nationalist politicians from Northern Ireland as well.

First Minister Nicola Sturgeon meeting with Ukraine's acting Consul General Yevhen Mankovskyi and Linda Allison, Chair of the Ukrainian community in Scotland, at Bute House in Edinburgh. | Flickr/Scottish Government

The fact that the Putin regime did not do so means that the Russians must have singled out Nicola Sturgeon for a different reason, because they genuinely believe that she is a threat to Putin’s interests and his Russian nationalist desire to destroy Ukrainian independence and Ukrainian nationhood and to incorporate the Ukrainian nation into his Greater Russia as “Little Russia.”

This can only be because Nicola Sturgeon is respected internationally as an articulate and influential voice and a strong and capable politician who is looked up to and admired throughout Europe for her convictions and principles and who is capable of swinging international support and opinion behind her, all qualities in which the serial liar and deceitmeister Boris Johnson and his government of lawbreaking immoral chancers are signally lacking.

No billionaire owner. No wealthy shareholders. PMP Magazine only exists thanks to donations from our readers.

Support our independent journalism

Meanwhile, Johnson and his Conservative lackeys shamelessly use the tragedy of Ukraine as a shield behind which to hide the Prime Minister’s and the Chancellor’s lawbreaking, trying to gaslight the UK into accepting that a period of international crisis is no time to get rid of a liar and a cheat who has repeatedly demonstrated that the only interests he cares about are his own. In fact, this current crisis is precisely why Johnson must go, and go immediately. However the Conservatives will not move against him for purely selfish and short-sighted party political reasons, because there is no obvious successor, the reputation of Rishi Sunak, the erstwhile golden boy of the Tory party having spectacularly imploded in multiple scandals deriving from his privileged entitlement. He wasn’t so much golden as brass-necked.

Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak. | Flickr/Number 10 - Simon Dawson

The contrast is a stark one. In Nicola Sturgeon Scotland has a leader who has international heft and clout and who has the moral and political authority to influence public opinion across the whole of Europe, she has spoken out and condemned the Russian attack on Ukraine in the strongest possible terms and has been vocal about the need to do more to support Ukrainian refugees and has not hesitated to condemn the British Government’s heartless insistence on visas and continues to urge Westminster to align its policy more closely with Europe. That is why the Putin regime has lashed out against her. It shows us that with independence, Scotland could have even greater clout and influence on the world stage and be a force for good in the world, unencumbered with British nationalism’s exceptionalism and delusional fantasies of global power.

PMP Magazine





What did you think of this article?
🤩     😀     🤔     😴     😮     😭     🤬     🤯




— AUTHOR —

Wee Ginger Dug, also known as Paul Kavanagh. Blogger. Biting the hand of Project Fear.


GET THEM INVOLVED:


Going Further:


[PMP]